Most accessibility audits read like a Lighthouse export with the score copy-pasted into a Word document. Federal procurement evaluators see through that immediately. Our WCAG 2.1 AA audits are written for a procurement-officer reader: scope statement, success-criterion matrix, representative manual tests…
**Automated layer:** axe-core, Lighthouse accessibility, WAVE, plus a manual reproducibility check on every flagged issue.
**Manual layer:** Keyboard-only navigation walkthrough, screen-reader testing (NVDA + VoiceOver baseline), focus management, skip-link verification, ARIA-correctness check, accessible name computation per WAI-ARIA 1.2.
**Forms layer:** Label associations, error handling, error-to-field linking, autocomplete attributes, accessible inline validation.
**PDF layer:** Tagged-structure check, reading order, alt text on images, table headers, form-field accessibility, language tag.
**Media layer:** Captions, transcripts, audio descriptions where required, autoplay/animation behaviour vs WCAG 2.2.1.
**Code layer:** Semantic HTML, heading hierarchy, landmark structure, lang attributes (especially for bilingual EN/FR pages). Considering wcag accessibility audits engineered? Book a no-pressure strategy call to compare options. Most businesses we onboard have never seen this layer addressed by their previous agency, which is exactly why our portfolios show 2–6× ranking lift in the first 90 days.
We deliver the audit in three files:
1. **Executive summary PDF (accessibly tagged)** — 2-page summary you can share with procurement evaluators or internal sponsors.
2. **Conformance matrix spreadsheet** — every WCAG 2.1 success criterion at A and AA, with status (pass / fail / partial / not applicable), evidence link, and remediation effort estimate (hours).
3. **Detailed findings document** — for each failure: screenshot, code excerpt, success-criterion citation, plain-language impact statement, and recommended fix.
All three deliverables are themselves accessibility-tagged — important when the evaluator is testing whether you actually live the standard. Throughout our work on wcag accessibility audits engineered, we cite primary sources and current data. For businesses competing in Ottawa and similar markets, this is the foundation of every program we build — get this right and the rest of the SEO stack compounds faster.
An audit that doesn't ship with a remediation path is half the deliverable. We follow every audit with a fixed-fee remediation engagement quote, scoped against the conformance matrix. Typical remediation is 60-180 hours for a 30-50 page corporate site; we work with your dev team or implement directly. If you're researching wcag accessibility audits engineered, this page covers what actually moves the needle in 2026. Most businesses we onboard have never seen this layer addressed by their previous agency, which is exactly why our portfolios show 2–6× ranking lift in the first 90 days. Our service clients win the Map Pack and the organic SERP simultaneously because we treat both surfaces as one integrated ranking surface, not two separate channels.
We re-test every remediated item against the original failure conditions and update the conformance matrix. The final deliverable is a passing matrix and an updated published accessibility statement on your site — both useful artifacts for the next RFP technical response. The service vertical has unique buyer-journey patterns; we encode those into the content architecture rather than retrofitting generic SEO templates onto a service site. Our service clients win the Map Pack and the organic SERP simultaneously because we treat both surfaces as one integrated ranking surface, not two separate channels.
For businesses, the SEO landscape has fundamentally changed in the last two years. Google now weighs Map Pack visibility, Google Business Profile signals, and reviews far more heavily than traditional on-page SEO factors for local service queries. That shift rewards businesses who treat their digital presence as an integrated system — Google Business Profile fully optimized with weekly posts and photo uploads, service-area pages that demonstrate real geographic relevance, structured data that surfaces in rich results, and a steady stream of authentic reviews tied to specific service categories. The businesses who win the Ottawa market in 2026 do all of this consistently, while the rest are stuck watching their phone-call volume drop quarter over quarter without understanding why. Our job is to give you the playbook and the senior-strategist execution that makes the difference between watching your competitors win and being the competitor everyone else is watching. We've shipped this work for businesses across Canada, and the patterns that drive results are remarkably consistent — when you execute them with discipline and at the standard the modern SERP demands.
1-2 weeks for a 30-50 page site, depending on PDF and form complexity. We can deliver an interim findings memo in 5 business days if you have an active RFP timeline.
CAD $7,500 - $14,500 for a typical corporate site. Sites over 100 pages or with extensive PDF libraries quote higher.
Either. We deliver remediation as a separate fixed-fee engagement, or we hand the conformance matrix to your dev team and re-test.
Yes — both languages tested. Language-attribute correctness across EN/FR transitions is one of the most common SWA failure modes we find.