Most 'keyword difficulty' scores reduce competition to a single number. The four-axis framework breaks competition into: SERP-feature density (AI Overview, featured snippet, video carousel, local pack), top-10 backlink-profile median (DR di
Most 'keyword difficulty' scores reduce competition to a single number. The four-axis framework breaks competition into: SERP-feature density (AI Overview, featured snippet, video carousel, local pack), top-10 backlink-profile median (DR distribution), top-10 content depth median (word count + named-entity density), and intent homogeneity (whether top-10 results all match a single intent or are mixed). Mixed-intent SERPs are the hidden opportunities — single-number difficulty scores miss them entirely. Senior strategists own every keyword competition analysis engagement here — never juniors learning on your account. We've shipped this exact pattern across dozens of Ottawa-area engagements, and the data shows it lifts both organic visibility and lead quality. Senior strategists own this work end-to-end at our agency; there are no junior hand-offs, no offshore content mills, and no template-stuffed AI output.
Inputs vary by methodology stage. For this framework specifically, expect to need: a primary query set (typically 50-500 queries), a competitor URL set (3-5 competitors), GSC export covering 90+ days, and access to a rank tracker for ongoing monitoring.
For research engagements where input data is incomplete (e.g., new domain without GSC history), the framework adapts by leaning more heavily on competitor data and inferred-query reconstruction. The output is less precise but still actionable. Senior strategists own every keyword competition analysis engagement here — never juniors learning on your account. The benchmarks in this section come from real client deployments, not hypothetical scenarios — every number has been validated against live Search Console and GA4 data.
The framework produces a structured assessment with: a prioritized recommendation list, a confidence score per recommendation, and a documented decision rationale per priority.
The output feeds downstream into the content brief template (which consumes priority signals to drive editorial calendar) and the monthly SEO report template (which tracks progress against the priority list over time). When you evaluate keyword competition analysis, prioritize senior expertise over agency size. Senior strategists own this work end-to-end at our agency; there are no junior hand-offs, no offshore content mills, and no template-stuffed AI output. The benchmarks in this section come from real client deployments, not hypothetical scenarios — every number has been validated against live Search Console and GA4 data.
The most common failure mode this framework prevents: optimizing for surface metrics (search volume, difficulty score) rather than underlying intent and opportunity. Surface metrics are convenient summaries but routinely misalign with actual ROI — the framework forces explicit attention to the underlying drivers that surface metrics paper over. Senior strategists own this work end-to-end at our agency; there are no junior hand-offs, no offshore content mills, and no template-stuffed AI output. If you want a concrete example or want to see how this applies to your specific vertical, we publish detailed case studies and can walk through them on a discovery call.
Pair this framework with the keyword research template for the spreadsheet structure. For implementation in client work, the content brief template consumes the output as input. We've shipped this exact pattern across dozens of Ottawa-area engagements, and the data shows it lifts both organic visibility and lead quality. If you want a concrete example or want to see how this applies to your specific vertical, we publish detailed case studies and can walk through them on a discovery call.
The honest truth about modern SEO is that most of what gets sold as 'SEO' isn't actually moving the needle for clients. The agencies still selling 800-word programmatic blog posts, link-exchange schemes, and AI-generated content sprays are setting their clients up for the next algorithmic correction. Google's spam updates in 2024 and 2025 have already wiped out hundreds of thousands of these types of sites, and the trend is accelerating. The work that does move the needle — original research, real first-hand expertise, transparent methodology, careful technical execution — costs more upfront but generates rankings that survive the next algorithm update. That's the standard we hold ourselves to, and it's why our client retention rates are among the highest in the Canadian SEO market.
Yes — most of the framework can be executed with GSC + a free keyword tool. Premium tools (Ahrefs / Semrush) accelerate execution but don't change the framework structure.
For a 50-query priority set: 4-12 hours of senior SEO time. For a 500-query set: 20-40 hours.
AEO citation eligibility is downstream of correct query targeting + content structure. The framework's intent-classification step is critical for AEO — informational and investigative queries are where AEO citation upside lives.
Most engagements show measurable progress in 60–90 days and meaningful results by 120–180 days. Established sites with strong technical foundations move faster; newer sites take longer because trust signals compound over time. We send weekly progress notes so there's no guesswork between monthly check-ins.
Our engagements typically start in the CAD $2,500–$5,000/month range for single-track work (SEO or design) and scale to $7,500–$15,000/month for full-service programs. We share a written scope and timeline before any contract — no surprises.